Posted: Apr 11, 2017 8:38 am
What won me over is that these stories are 100% true, not just 93% true, or 50% true, but a full 100%.
That has to be legit, right? I mean you can't just make something up and claim it is 100% true, statistics like that convey certainty, which implies rigorous testing and peer review. Who am I to argue with the backing of the professional scientific community which must have verified these claims over and over again to reach 100% certainty?
That has to be legit, right? I mean you can't just make something up and claim it is 100% true, statistics like that convey certainty, which implies rigorous testing and peer review. Who am I to argue with the backing of the professional scientific community which must have verified these claims over and over again to reach 100% certainty?