rationalskepticism.org

Fila wrote:I'm just asking.., seeing as you speak with such authority on the subject.., what YOU would consider.

I don't claim UFOs exist, so it's not my job to invent projects for people chasing figments of their imaginations. If they're making observations of something, well let them keep submitting their 'evidence'. I would consider that they are chasing figments of their imaginations until such time as they show they aren't.

Fila wrote:

Cito di Pense wrote:There aren't any examples of what anyone is "meant" to look for. This criterion of "better evidence" is entirely up to the UFO community to establish

Thank you for your answer.
Images, and statements are all witnesses can provide.

If you're an authority on the matter, then surely you will be able to say that some of the evidence is better than the rest; you'll consequently be able to cite it, and you won't insist that every scrap of evidence is worth investigating further. That should tell you what I would consider. Before I would consider any of that, I would consider that you're trolling an internet forum.