Posted: Feb 27, 2019 12:36 pm
by Destroyer
zulumoose wrote:
Fila wants to know what level of evidence is required to make a claim worthy of scientific investigation. He/she seems to be convinced that a substantial amount of corroborative eyewitness UFO reports ought to warrant scientific analysis


I am of the opinion that Fila can't seem to get over the perceived injustice, that someone can witness something and not be taken seriously. He seems to be convinced that if you have seen something incredible, you are MEANT to be able to achieve credibility, and something is wrong with "science" if you can't.

His emphasis seems to be on the quantity of eyewitness reports. He seems to think that to discount so many is an injustice.