Posted: Nov 28, 2019 2:19 am
by Spearthrower
ORZIL wrote:
Svartalf wrote:absence of evidence seems, in the current case, seem to be worth a licence to ignore and regard as woo, if not a full case of evidence of absence.

if the belief in such beings is not supported by anything verifiable, Ockham's razor dictates that the importance of the purported being is null and negligible.

Existential Fallacy of Data :think:

A few words without any substance, and without an attempt to engage, and without apparently even reading the post you're nominally replying to.

Stop right now Orzil and think for a moment about how you intend to go forward from here because if this is how you're going to behave, then you will be treated accordingly and it will be entirely your fault.