Posted: Oct 21, 2011 1:00 pm
by virphen
jamest wrote:
You don't appear to understand. If the skull isn't Hitlers, then the Soviets never found his body. If the Soviets never found his body, then those that led them to it were either lying or fooled = no material evidence + dodgy witnesses.


The skull fragment concerned was not recovered with the rest of the remains that were exhumed in 1945 and matched to Hitler's dental records. It was only found in 1946, in roughly the same general area, and could have belonged to anyone.

Your claim that the discovery that the skull fragment could not possibly belong to Hitler implies the witnesses were unreliable is a total non sequitur.