Posted: Dec 14, 2012 4:06 am
I didn't really mean it to be "ass-backwards". Just regular backwards. Ass-backwards reasoning is involved, but I meant it more as a neat observation of how they start big and go small. You might have worked that out too a while ago, but I was pretty smug when the idea first came to me.tolman wrote:Oh, I can understand the ass-backwards reasoning involved, and why it results in stupid arguments.
The rest of your post is just agreeing with me so there's really nothing to respond to there.