Posted: Apr 20, 2013 7:30 pm
CdesignProponentsist wrote:What is interesting about it?
What's not? A guy in the midst of a gun fight was forced to strip down and arrested and paraded naked on the news. What's not interesting about that?
CdesignProponentsist wrote:I think everyone else is interested in the actual suspects, their possible motivations, their family, their history, their friends, other possible co-conspirators or groomers and more importantly why. The news outlets want to follow what everyone else in interested in not some channel changing side story about a misidentified naked man in a police car.
Now you speak for everyone else?
The "news" covers what "everyone is interested in". My fuck, what are you on? Our state news network ran 24-7 news about the fucking queen and the pope. You are speaking nonsense.CdesignProponentsist wrote:Eyeballs means ad revenue. Stories that don't keep eyeballs glued to their channel is revenue lost.
and like I already said. The story IS interesting. For you to say it's not is simply wrong. It's a part of the story.
CdesignProponentsist wrote:Also there is the consideration of the naked man himself. Maybe he wants his privacy, maybe they contacted him and he said he didn't want to be known. Understandable after having your junk displayed to the entire world.
I have never knows a "news" agency to take into consideration someones privacy. You may be right, but, it is just speculation and highly unlikely.