Posted: May 15, 2013 10:07 am
Blackadder wrote:Weaver wrote:No one has ever claimed that vaccines are completely without risk of negative effects in isolated, rare cases.
What is clearly acknowledged, by honest reporters, is that these negative effects are RARE, and the risk is FAR outweighed by the benefits of the vaccine.
Exactly. All medical procedures carry some element of risk, however small. Pretty much every human activity carries some risk but we learn to live with the risks when they are clearly outweighed by the benefits.
Yes, but nowdays vaccines carry more risks than benefits
Teague wrote:the_5th_ape wrote:Freedom of Information Act in the UK filed by a doctor there has revealed 30 years of secret official documents showing that government experts have
1. Known the vaccines don’t work (in some cases - found in one line of text somewhere in one report so it means ALL vaccines of course)
2. Known they cause the diseases they are supposed to prevent (in some cases - found in one line of text somewhere in one report so it means ALL vaccines of course)
3. Known they are a hazard to children (in some cases - found in one line of text somewhere in one report so it means ALL vaccines of course)
4. Colluded to lie to the public (in some cases - found in one line of text somewhere in one report so it means ALL vaccines of course)
5. Worked to prevent safety studies (in some cases - found in one line of text somewhere in one report so it means ALL vaccines of course)
There I think I fixed that for you and no, I haven't read any of it, but am I right?
