rationalskepticism.org

the_5th_ape wrote:

Fallible wrote:

the_5th_ape wrote:

Fallible wrote:For fucks sake, I'm not in a position to read the links at the moment. Can't you just answer the flamin question?

You could have just said that you dont have interest to know what is in that link

These dodges of yours are quite informative, I must say.

You wont be taxed for clicking that goddamn fckng link.

Maybe not, but I do wonder why you and some others are so keen on posting links and videos without any summaries.
It's almost as if there's some benefit to someone from having traffic driven to them.

Anyway, experience has shown me that most of the links and videos you post are a waste of time, so it would be a tax on my time, so I no longer bother following your bullshit links.