Posted: May 05, 2010 6:14 pm
HoG wrote:I'll humour you uke2se, but really I'm just bookmarking the new thread.
- Hijacked airliners slammed into the WTC towers and the Pentagon: WTC, Accept. Pentagon, don't know but I'm leaning towards accept.
- The resulting damage and fires caused the towers to collapse: Don't know but I'm leaning towards accept.
- Debris from the collapse of the towers caused fires in WTC 7: Accept
- Damage from the collapse of the towers ruptured the water mains, knocking out any fire fighting effort in WTC7: Accept
- After burning for many hours, WTC7 collapsed due to the fire weakening the structure: Do not accept. If you re-word it to after burning for many hours, WTC7 collapsed due to fire weakening the structure and the damage caused from the collapse of WTC1 and WTC2, than I would say I don't know but I'm leaning towards accepting it.
It seems you accept the official story thus far then.
HoG wrote:
- A hijacked plane crashed in Pennsylvania due to a struggle between passengers and hijackers: Accepted because it's the most rational explanation, although you have to admit it's a pretty suspicious looking crash site.
No, I don't think there's anything suspicious about it. Glad you accept this part of the official story as well, though.
HoG wrote:
- The criminals perpetrating the attacks were 19 misguided Muslim extremists, funded in part by rich Muslim extremists: Don't know.
So, is this the part where you want further investigation? I mean, you accept (or lean towards acceptance) the entirety of the official story. What more do you want?