Posted: May 06, 2010 5:56 pm
Galaxian wrote:[url=http://www.rational-skepticism.org/viewtopic.php?p=178186#p178186]uke2se[/url] wrote:- Hijacked airliners slammed into the WTC towers and the Pentagon.[url=http://www.rational-skepticism.org/viewtopic.php?p=178173#p178173]PJG[/url] wrote:
Tell you what - you make a list of the things that you think represent the "mainstream view presented in this thread" and I will tell you if I "accept", "don't believe/accept" or "don't know".
- The resulting damage and fires caused the towers to collapse.
- Debris from the collapse of the towers caused fires in WTC 7.
- Damage from the collapse of the towers ruptured the water mains, knocking out any fire fighting effort in WTC7.
- After burning for many hours, WTC7 collapsed due to the fire weakening the structure.
- A hijacked plane crashed in Pennsylvania due to a struggle between passengers and hijackers.
- The criminals perpetrating the attacks were 19 misguided Muslim extremists, funded in part by rich Muslim extremists.
That's the mainstream view. What do you not agree with?
What a load of CRAP. That is NOT the mainstream view! the mainstream view by a big margin is that 9/11 was a totally inside job or hugely aided & abetted by the US secret services & possibly Israel's Mossad.
And yu fucking well know what we don't agree with, don't play silly buggers; this is a serious issue.
Since you don't even know what the mainstream view is; the opposite of "Truther" is "Liar" is it not???
No, that is the mainstream view. The "inside job" view is a fringe nutjob view, held by an diminishing amount of people who can't justify their beliefs.
The opposite of truther isn't liar. Truther is synonymous with liar.
/Edit: Darnit, I always forget the coffee emoticons.
