Posted: Jun 13, 2017 2:34 am
Sorry, what's your point? If the numbers aren't impressive what's the point of a link that does nothing other than compute those numbers and get them wrong?
And regardless of that, how is getting them right not an improvement on getting them wrong? Isn't this guy part of a movement that literally named itself after "truth"?
And regardless of that, how is getting them right not an improvement on getting them wrong? Isn't this guy part of a movement that literally named itself after "truth"?