Posted: Oct 05, 2017 8:20 pm
felltoearth wrote:proudfootz wrote:
Funnily enough, GrahamH seems to think that even if some 'facts' claimed in the post have been debunked, it is still valid:
"Irrespective of whether the site refers to sources that may have been 'debunked' on some issues..."
The quotes around the word debunked seems to suggest that there is some doubt about the claim to debunking.
And it's helpful to read the rest of what he wrote in that context.
I read it in context, as can everyone.
There is nothing hidden here.
For example, the context of the quote you snipped from my post is available.
Thank you for your concern!
