Posted: Oct 05, 2017 9:13 pm
by Animavore
proudfootz wrote:
Animavore wrote:
proudfootz wrote:You're right - it is a crazy argument in post #2.

Did you seriously just use the, "I know you are but what am I?" argument again?

:lol:


WTF is wrong with you? :scratch:

You think your kind of bullshit is convincing to anyone? :doh:

The post which you claim (maybe jokingly, maybe not - it is impossible to tell) that 'says it all' is a list of arguments about whom the poster believes 'must be' involved in some theory regarding 9/11.

It's a pure Gish Gallop - no ifs, ands, or buts.

But that seems to tickle your fancy, so you think that is the be-all and end-all of discussion.

As you've made clear, you are only here for the lulz. Always happy to see you are entertained by our own apparent inability to understand what others are talking about.

:drunk:


Jesus! You really don't understand Gish gallop at all.

A Gish gallop goes like this -

If evolution is true then why are there no transitional fossils? Why don't we see dogs giving birth to cats? How can there be half an eye? How did the first life evolve? What happened before the Big Bang?

A list of barely or unconnected questions the arguer beliefs need to all be fulfilled to satisfy their unrealistic expectations.

This is not like that. At all.