Posted: Oct 05, 2017 9:40 pm
If aspire1670 wants to 'prove' all those people named and unnamed would have to be 'in on it' the ball is in his court.
don't try the old 'reversal of the burden of proof' schtick on me - I'm wise to that one.
don't try the old 'reversal of the burden of proof' schtick on me - I'm wise to that one.