Posted: Jul 16, 2018 12:09 am
by Just A Theory
psikeyhackr wrote:
Thommo wrote:
psikeyhackr wrote:I don't agree, but that's 100% irrelevant to whether the programme is shit. They could be 100% thorough, or 0% thorough, in either case the programme gets it wrong and shows nothing.


So write a program that computes collapse time based on gravity and the Conservation of Momentum and demonstrate that my program is incorrect.

All you can do is talk.

The NIST cannot make the Conservation of Momentum go away not matter what. Is anyone claiming that the towers did not have mass? Then how can the CoM not affect collapse time? Your argument is nothing but name calling.


This is pretty simple and Thommo has already explained it to you.

You can go back and literally watch the footage of the towers collapsing. I saw it live, many others did too. You can get out your trusty stopwatch and time it.

Your program shows a different numerical result. Ergo, your program is incorrect.

QED.