rationalskepticism.org

Tremilberg wrote:One might wonder why no one on a thread devoted to discussing 9/11 still hasn't mentioned the University of Fairbanks study of the collapse of WTC7. In short the study finds that the building did not, and could not have collapsed as a result of fire, even when they used faulty NIST data, and the only way to get the building to collapse the way it did, was if all supporting columns were taken out simultaneously. http://ine.uaf.edu/wtc7