Posted: Jul 27, 2020 7:52 pm
proudfootz wrote:Animavore wrote:Here's a really long and detailed one on the "acoustical evidence.
http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/odell/
Here's one of those peer reviewed papers occasionally demand:Summary and Conclusions
The validity of acoustic evidence for a gunshot from the‘Grassy Knoll’ was challenged on statistical grounds and on the basis of an anomaly on the Dallas police recordings. However, the assumptions underlying those criticisms were not in accord with evidence overlooked by the review panel. With a rigorous statistical analysis one arrives at a calculation for the probability that the recording contains a random pattern which by chance resembled the acoustic signature of a gunshot from the Grassy Knoll at no more than p= 0.037.
...
The unambiguous cross-talk evidence indicates that the gunshot-like sounds on channel one were recorded over the police radio at the precise instant in real time that the President was being assassinated by gun-fire.The order in the data, that is, the congruence between the acoustic evidence and the sequence of events derived from a reconstruction of the crime from video evidence is the major factor that led acoustic experts to conclude that there was a gunshot from the Grassy Knoll during the assassination.
http://www.jfklancer.com/pdf/Thomas.pdf
Science triumphs over the emotional pull of the 'lone nut' scenario favored by denialists.
This is what is dealt with and refuted in the link I posted.
I'm not sure what the "emotional pull" of the lone nut scenario is supposed to mean. I wasn't around for all of this so it's just a story to me. One that's the flavour of the month to me right now because I'm a little bored, by next week I'll be into something else.
You have way more investment in this than me. You actually care about this.