Posted: Aug 01, 2020 11:50 am
proudfootz wrote::roll:Animavore wrote:Can you point me towards material that names the conspirators along with documents and/or recordings of their meetings and interactions as well as motives, please?
Thanks.
Supposing we needed audio recordings or transcripts of a high level meeting among plotters along with confessions of their motives to reasonably conclude there was a conspiracy is ludicrous.
It's certainly not the standard used in courts of law to obtain convictions of conspirators.
Is this serious? Are you saying courts can convict people of conspiracy without evidence of involvement in a conspiracy? Like no emails, letters, witnesses or CCTV which puts them with other conspirators, getting caught committing the conspiracy, testimony from other conspirators on a plea bargain, etc.? That a court just has to show there was likely a conspiracy of some sort by people they can't even point to to convict... who would you even convict here?
Is this what you're actually saying?
