rationalskepticism.org

The_Metatron wrote:

felltoearth wrote:Edit. Fuck it. I’m not getting drawn into this again. It’s a complete waste of time.

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

I came here for an argument!

ROFL

An argument about what? The $20,000,000 report that implies that it is about skyscraper collapses and studies airliner impacts and resulting fires to death but says nothing about the distributions of steel and concrete that had to be determined to support the structures?

Find the total amount of concrete in the towers and point out how idiotic I must be not to have found it. I searched on 'steel' to try to find the distribution but only found the totals. The word 'concrete' occurs between 3,000 and 3,500 times. 10 years ago I probably could have told you the exact number. Must be Alzheimer's.


This is rather amusing:

http://www.rationalskepticism.org/consp ... ml#p602143