Posted: Sep 17, 2021 9:26 am
by newolder
It looks like you, psikeyhackr, are addressing the post directly above your last and I've been drawn in again, haven't I? :doh: Heigh ho...
psikeyhackr wrote:So quote what the Scientific American article said about mechanical floors.

Your momentum equation of post #9622 asks for a “falling mass” that is, to first approximation n times the single floor mass supplied by the SciAm link above and where n is the number of falling floors. Note that n increases as the collapse gathers more floors. Therefore, there is no requirement for me to, “... quote what the Scientific American article said about mechanical floors.”

I read it within a few months of its publication. It never.said anything worth paying attention to.

You've had 20 years to address your lack of comprehension skills...

1% of an atomic bomb while not saying distribution of mass would affect the so called potential energy. :lol:

... yet you choose to end your post with an incoherent rant. I'm only guessing that you'll post more gibberish after this so, if I choose to ignore you in future, don't fret. :wave: