Posted: Nov 20, 2021 8:22 pm
Agi Hammerthief wrote:psikeyhackr wrote:
I am pointing out that the explanation is lacking along with the data necessary to do a competent analysis.
the incarnation of incompetence on this (i.e.: you) is murmuring about „a competent analysis“
you haven‘t got a fucking clue.psikeyhackr wrote:You don't know anything and have nothing meaningful to say.
projection much?
what you are doing is the equivalent of sitting in a padded room going
„weNEEDmoreDATAweNEEDmoreDATA
psikeyhackr wrote:We are missing a whole lot of concrete. Where did it go?
I‘ve got an idea:
They hid it in the attic!1
Where nobody noticed it for 28years!!1!
or maybe it just got embezzled
Projection? LOL
The Twin Towers had 6 basement levels. 5% of 116 story buildings.
We're they 5% of the Mass. There have been diagrams of the box columns made from 4" steel slabs. Is that what was used above the 100th floor? Of course, would they use light weight concrete in the basements?
The tilted top of the South Tower broke above the 2nd maintenance level while the 3rd maintenance level was at the top of the building along with the hat truss. And though the NIST admits that the tilt was 20 to 25 degrees no "expert source" discusses the center of gravity and why it did not fall down the side.
Mere projections however, gravity and distribution of mass are irrelevant.
[778176]