Posted: Nov 21, 2021 10:50 pm
The_Metatron wrote:So, what's the answer?
You are desperate to convince us you have the answer, so what is it? Get to your punchline.
When you get there, follow up by explaining how it is that you, and only you, have the unbridled genius to figure out what no one else can.
I have no idea what you mean by THE ANSWER!
Just because airliner impact and fire could not totally destroy a 1360 ft skyscraper in less than two hours does not mean I know what did. Suspecting and Knowing are two different things.
The social failure of so many people failing to analyze the destruction of the Twin Towers is more important than the destruction of the Twin Towers.
It is just a physics problem DAMN IT!
I gather most people don't want to consider the consequences of proving airliners could not do it.
I don't give a shit!
The economics profession ignoring the depreciation of durable consumer goods worldwide wide is more important but that does not seem to bother most morons.
LOL