Posted: Nov 12, 2010 1:54 am
Patriots4Truth wrote:uke2se wrote:Patriots4Truth wrote:
ps you have to prove there was measurable deceleration when the upper section hit the lower section of WTC1, if you want to prove Szamboti's video analysis on this particular subject wrong
I don't have to. The link I provided shows that Szamboti didn't know what he was doing, thus his methodology is all wrong, thus his conclusions are worthless.
Szamboti is a mechanical engineer and here's his missing jolt paper that I'm sure you've heard about several times already. Now what specifically is your problem regarding his methodology in which he showed no measurable deceleration when the top section of the wtc1 hit the bottom section
Do you not realize that it has been your turn to point out contradictions for the last two pages? Saying "go read several pages at an unsubstantial debunker forum" isn't going to cut it. Focus on your point if you are trying to make one. I don't even know if you have a contradiction. You seem to be struggling to write one down
Go back to the link I provided to you. Take your mouse pointer and click on the link. Read the single post as opposed to a whole thread or a whole forum that clicking the links brings you to. Then you will know why Szamboti was wrong. If you admit in this thread to being unable to click a link, I will take the trouble to copy-paste the post and waste more space, but only if you admit that you are unable to use your web browser to click on a link.
For you to practice, this is a link to my post where I posted the link. Take it slow and don't hurt yourself.