Posted: Nov 30, 2010 3:15 am
by econ41
psikeyhackr wrote:... So let's see you build a physical model that can support its own weight and yet be TOTALLY collapsed by dropping the top 15% or less on the rest....

This topic is not about my ability to build physical models. And I can explain the "global collapse" adequately by words possibly assisted by simple diagrams. No models required.

To the extent that models are relevant they should/could be models which are valid analogues of WTC collapse processes.

Given that the "global collapse" of the twin towers is so easily explained without models there is no real scope there. And the "initial collapse" is probably beyond physical modelling.