Posted: Nov 30, 2010 4:31 pm
by uke2se
psikeyhackr wrote:
The idiocy used to rationalize the belief that an airliner could TOTALLY DESTROY a building 2000 times its mass in less than 2 hours and then not tell people the distribution of mass even though that was part of getting it to hold itself up is pretty boring.


Why do 9/11 conspiracy theorists always pull out this whopper? I mean, lying this boldly isn't making their "movement" look less like the laughing stock it is.

For those with a few brain-cells to rub together: nobody is claiming that an airliner TOTALLY DESTROYED the WTC. Airliner impact damage and FIRE removed the supports. Gravity did the rest.