Posted: Dec 01, 2010 3:14 am
by psikeyhackr
econ41 wrote:2 The insults directed at "some people" when it is the physics of your claims which is wrong;
3 The truism that physics "does not give a damn" attached to the false inference that others - in this case I - have the physics wrong.

And who gives a damn about building "...a self supporting model that can be crushed by the top 15% of its own weight?"

The real world had two full scale models where a small top section "caused the collapse" of the lower section. Those real examples were WTC1 and WTC2 and the top bit did not "crush" the bottom bit as you are fully aware. So your analogy by inference is false.

Only by assuming nothing besides the plane was involved.

If the plane did it you should be able to build the model. If you can't then...