Posted: Dec 02, 2010 3:57 am
by hotshoe
Patriots4Truth wrote:
hotshoe wrote:
Patriots4Truth wrote:... collapse scenarios that support natural collapse are relatively new ...

That's a lie.

Go ahead and retract it. It might do you good to tell the truth.


what I said wasn't a lie. You failed to quote the whole sentence.

"pretty sad that the only feasible global collapse scenarios that support natural collapse are relatively new and are still under construction/scrutiny"

Bull puckey. A feasible global collapse scenario - supporting natural collapse - was introduced by our very own econ41 more than three years ago - NOT relatively new - and you've had it explained to you several times here. So, it's a lie you just told, and then repeated. Go ahead and keep repeating it.

The fact that you chose to believe and repeat the lies of the so-called truthers does not make it the truth.