rationalskepticism.org

psikeyhackr wrote:

Nicko wrote:The sidetracking of people who could be constructive political dissidents by your pointless conspiracy theory has already been pointed out. You have greater faith in the US goverment's abilities than the people who think demolition or "false flag" is a load of old cobblers.

What have I said about conspiracies or false flags? Link to my posts.

My collapse video has no verbal content. It shows mass being accelerated by gravity hitting more mass. The written description has sufficient information for anyone to duplicate it. The government is irrelevant to physics. The human race is irrelevant to physics.

Wasn't the destruction of the north tower supposedly mass being accelerated by gravity completely destroying more mass below?

But we don't have accurate data on the tons of steel and tons of concrete on every level. Now why is that and why aren't supposedly intelligent people asking. Of course maybe they aren't intelligent.

Curiously Steven Jones and Richard Gage and Kevin Ryan aren't making a big deal of that missing information either. I asked Richard Gage about it in 2008. He got this shocked look on his face and then game me a LAME excuse about the NIST not releasing accurate blue prints. But the distribution has to be determined by gravity which is the same all over the world and doesn't change. It explains why the CN Tower is shaped like this:



This business is the 9/11 Religion believers versus the 9/11 Conspiracy Crackpots but the laws of physics are incapable of giving a damn about either one. But the engineering schools should have been talking about the distributions of steel and concrete within six months of 9/11. So why isn't it resolved in NINE YEARS? Does simple Newtonian physics need to be made to look complicated? How do they justify $100,000+ for 4 years of education.

Purdue makes a SCIENTIFIC SIMULATION where the core columns don't move.

psik