Posted: Dec 03, 2010 3:07 am
That may be your rule - hence the nonsense models - it is not mine.psikeyhackr wrote:...So the bottom line is everybody is supposed to not think for themselves and think what they are told no matter how STUPID it is...
I am well aware of the good work that Ryan Mackey has done...psikeyhackr wrote:...Tell Ryan Mackey what is wrong with his "model".
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZT4BXIpdIdo
psik
....also some of the limitations in his modelling - two areas in particular being where he takes NIST over-literally and ditto Bazant et al.
but the objective of this thread is for posting members to have discussion.
I have responded to the two substantive bits of your posts - those being your irrelevant model and your references to weight distribution where you fail to show what relevance that data has to the discussion of WTC collapse on 9/11.
Ball in your court therefore.