Posted: Feb 24, 2011 3:20 am
by NeedAnswers
tnjrp wrote:
NeedAnswers wrote:Well they have a good idea of who it was, the guy had a name and that name has been "connected" to the Rosicrucians but they don't claim the guidestones are theirs and they don't claim to have any type of evil will towards mankind. So then either they're lying or that explanation doesn't work.
Err... Okay. Not. IOW, I'm not at all sure what you are saying here. Do Rosicrusians have some "evil will towards mankind" because "that explanation doesn't work" or what? :scratch:


:shock: I'll reexplain that...

They do have an idea of a name for the guy who built or commissioned the guidestones to be built (they believe it to be a false name).

The Rosicrucians do not claim that they built the guidestones.

Either the RSC are lying about their motives (the things written on the guidestones can be taken in one of only a few popular understandings) and that they built it, or the idea that a Rosicrucian built it and the group backed it's words is not the correct explanation for the guidestones.

Sorry about the lack of clarity.