Posted: May 09, 2011 6:11 pm
Having read a few of his books years ago, if you ignore the lizard claims, he does connect a lot of companies together with politicians and who gains from what. I think if he could, he'd go back and take away the lizards but just because he's wrong about a few things, doesn't mean he's wrong about everything. From what I remember his books seemed well researched, but it was years ago and i had a different outlook on life back then. If he claims there was a conspiracy to invade iraq and afghanistan for their oil and gas reserves, was he wrong?
I do know that he thinks Princess Diana was killed as a ritual sacrifice, looking at the dates, times, palce and even the 13th pillar the car hit as having meaning, not necessarily to us or that it means anything, but to the people behind the crime it means a lot.
One thing that always struck me as odd was the claim that all cctv along her route was not working that day, the same as 7/7 in the london bombings (i think london underground then came out and said it was bollocks because they were all serviced a few days earlier).
Every CCTV camera? The likelihood of that happening is miniscule so I can see how it raises questions.
One really odd thing from my own experience. I remember watching the news or something and it had PD on it and there was some talk about her security. Both myself and my friend turned around and said she was being set up to be killed and a year or so later she had the accident. I'm not saying this is anything factual, but at the time, with what was going on, it really seemed like they were after her.
Whatever happened to PD may never be known and conspiracy theories are appealling to people but I don't think we should dismiss everything. However if we wait for facts that will never be forthcoming, and there is a conspiracy, I guess we'll never know the truth, which is ultimately want we all want to know, and that want can make us accept anything that makes sense to us.