Posted: Jul 22, 2011 1:16 pm
RE: the article by the Washington Times ...
I wouldn't trust anything written by that rag - they have a long history of out-of-context citation, quote-mining, and outright lying in support of their articles attempting to bash Obama and his various aides.
This particular claim, that Holdren (note - he is NOT a "science czar" - he was confirmed by the Senate in 2009, and should therefore be titled "Director") was nominated for Polti-fact's Lie Of The Year. In 2009.
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter ... en-propos/
I wouldn't trust anything written by that rag - they have a long history of out-of-context citation, quote-mining, and outright lying in support of their articles attempting to bash Obama and his various aides.
This particular claim, that Holdren (note - he is NOT a "science czar" - he was confirmed by the Senate in 2009, and should therefore be titled "Director") was nominated for Polti-fact's Lie Of The Year. In 2009.
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter ... en-propos/