Posted: Nov 15, 2012 2:54 pm
johnbrandt wrote:
Why should I assume that? If they did, it would change emissions from human industry. But it won't happen. Full stop. What is the use in imagining some hypothetical future where all the worlds various governments suddenly put aside the economic good of their individual countries, the need to provide employment and reliable plentiful relatively cheap power for the population and industry, and decided to act as one single entity?
Good point. Why would all the words governments put aside economic good for slavery?
Why would all the words governments put aside economic good for womens rights?
Why would all the words governments put aside economic good for anti-pollution laws?
Why would all the words governments put aside economic good for anti-racism laws?
Why would all the words governments put aside economic good for over-fishing laws?
Look, if someone came here using that logic to justify another idea, no one would accept it. So why do you expect us to buy into this agenda driven nonsense?