Posted: Sep 30, 2014 9:55 am
by monkeyboy
MarioNovak wrote:
Sendraks wrote:
MarioNovak wrote:Likewise, we have knowledge based on facts learned through experiments and observation which shows that reproductive function of any organism cease to exist if we reduce core components of reproductive system.


Did you read any of the posts above or did you just ignore all the content that destroyed your argument?

Actually I did not make an argument, I only presented science observation that reproductive system of all cellular life forms without exception, from archaea, bacteria to eukaryote can't exist in reduced state.
Descriptions of life and living organisms, their structure, function, growth, distribution, and taxonomy....presented in the posts above won't change that. Since evolution presuppose reduced state this theory is in contradiction with observed biological reality and therefore false.


So, just for me, a simple mechanism that evolved to turn beer into piss, please explain. Are you suggesting that if you remove a part of of body which has over millions of years evolved to be necessary in one fell swoop, rendering the subject of your mutilation, in this case a once intact man to be non intact and incapable of impregnating his good lady, thus demonstrating that testicles are necessary, you have debunked evolution?