Posted: Oct 04, 2017 8:59 am
by archibald
Stephen Paddock is a good example to cite (or rather the actions of Stephen Paddock are) if we are talking about better ways to approach and justify moral judgements in the ways that have been put forward (by Sam Harris, Finlay, etc).

Because whatever the inevitable flaws and complications, those approaches are better than what we are hearing on the TV, that we are dealing with 'pure evil'.