Posted: Jan 07, 2018 3:01 pm
by Thomas Eshuis
DavidMcC wrote:
Thomas Eshuis wrote:
DavidMcC wrote:
Thomas Eshuis wrote:
The big bang is a theory about the origin of our local representation of the universe, not the universe as a whole.

Yeah, sure, but that is just an admission that the big bang theory does not make sense as a cosmology

That's a non-sequitur.

No, it isn't. It's a logical conclusion.

Wrong, for it to be a logical conclusion you'd first need to present a valid argument.
You've done no such thing. What you've done is:
P1. X is not a claim about Y.
C. Therefore X is not about Z.

DavidMcC wrote: If you disagree with that, then please explain how we have many local starts of the universe, all from nothing.

I thought you understood the concept of the burden of proof David?