rationalskepticism.org

GrahamH wrote:

ughaibu wrote:Simulations do not have the properties of the things that they simulate.

That is grossly overstated. SImulations have some of the properties of things they simulate, else they would not be simulations of those things.

What utter nonsense. Tell me, what non-trivial properties do simulations of weather systems and actual weather systems share? As we are incorrigibly subject to weather, this example suffices to refute simulation arguments.