Posted: Oct 14, 2018 8:43 am
Kafei wrote:theropod wrote:Hero dose? Seriously? This shit is pure comedy gold. They need to talk to a few of us old hard core hippies about what really constitutes a “hero dose”. I contend this “hero dose” is barely enough to have a good trip.
The heroic dose is not a joke. If you're interested in what a heroic dose entails, I recommend the lectures of Kilindi Iyi or Terence McKenna.
How is your recommendation worth anything? You could leave that part out. And then we still have to take somebody else's word for it. This whole game boils down to "If you haven't done it, you don't know what you're missing." I'll tell you what a "heroic dose" entails. It entails a lot of circularity. The anecdotes are there just so you can smugly puff out your chest with bullshit.
You claim this is "established science" and you've been asked repeatedly to provide references from PubMed or similar databases, and it's pointed out repeatedly that you have failed to provide the necessary legitimate references to "established science". You can take that to mean 'peer-reviewed by established scientists with a published track record'. You're entitled to your own fantasy-world definition of 'established science", but do consider the relation between your failures to document your claims and the reception your bullshit is getting, here.