Posted: Jan 04, 2019 8:21 am
Destroyer wrote:
Again I ask you what do you think "his claims" actually were and how were they supported?
His claims are obvious: The man persisted that this particular drug induced mystical experiences. Whether or not that is the case, I haven't the slightest interest. But let any say that Kafei himself was not utterly convinced of this.[/quote]
Was he claiming those were experiences of something actually mystical?
I mean, claiming that drugs induce psychedelic experiences is not claiming anything interesting, is it?
It could be we agree, that was all he did, over and over again, which wasn't really contested and has no real significance to anything. Isn't that trolling?
Is there something substantive that you think he claimed, that had any evidential support?