Posted: Jan 09, 2019 10:10 pm
Destroyer wrote:Cito di Pense wrote:Destroyer wrote:The moment that Kafei made repeated claims about the research which were not in accord with the research, that is when he needed to be warned.
What moment was that? First of all, there was no research that Kafei was citing; all his arguments came from mouthpieces in youtube videos. Are you suggesting posters be warned when somebody complains that their ideas are not in accord with some other ideas? Kafei's not a blank slate. He's been kicked off other forums, and has had talk show hosts hang up on him.
It seems your idea of forum moderation is that it is acting in loco parentis and it also seems you think moderation is performing a designated task on your behalf. If you don't mind my saying so, both you and Kafei seem to have a similar problem with taking "No" for an answer as to whether anyone takes your opinion seriously.
If Kafei has not been making specific claims about the research into Psilocybin, which must surely be open to scrutiny, then why has his interlocutors constantly accused him of misrepresenting the research?
If you want to conduct an inquest, do it in the feedback threads. This isn't the time or place to review moderation decisions.