Posted: Mar 08, 2020 4:14 am
"science/mathematics ends in meaninglessness
Magister colin leslie dean the only modern Renaissance man with 9 degrees including 4 masters: B,Sc, BA, B.Litt(Hons), MA, B.Litt(Hons), MA, MA (Psychoanalytic studies), Master of Psychoanalytic studies, Grad Cert (Literary studies) : who proved Godels theorems to be invalid
He is also Australia's leading erotic poet
http://gamahucherpress.yellowgum.com/book-genre/poetry/
and showed science/mathematics ends in meaninglessness
1)Mathematics/science ends in contradiction:an integer=a non-integer
http://gamahucherpress.yellowgum.com/wp ... ssible.pdf
2)Mathematics ends in contradiction:6 examples example 1 it is proven 1+1=1
http://gamahucherpress.yellowgum.com/wp ... MATICS.pdf
all very simple and clear
the facts are
1) it is proven an integer = a non-integer
1 is a finite number it stops
A finite decimal is one that stops, like 0.157
A non-finite decimal like 0.888... does not stop
A non-finite decimal like 0.999... does not stop
when a finite number 1 = a non-finite number 0.999.. then maths ends in contradiction
another way
1 is an integer a whole number
0.888... is a non-integer it is not a whole number
0.999... is a non-integer not a whole number
when a integer 1 =a non-integer 0.999... maths ends in contradiction
)1)Darwins book is called On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection ....
but
this paper shows natural selection is not the origin of new species Natural selection is not the origin of new species
http://gamahucherpress.yellowgum.com/bo ... ection.pdf
"Natural selection does not generate new genes/species Natural selection adds no new genetic information as it only
deals with the passing on of genes/traits already present and it will be pointed out genetics cannot account for
the generation of new species/genes as it is claimed the generation of new genes [via mutation] is a random
process due to radiation, viruses, chemicals etc and genetic cannot account for these process happening as they
are out side the scope of genetics physics, chaos theory etc may give some explanation but genetics cant"
2) Biologist cant tell us what a species is -without contradiction thus evolution theory ie evolving species is nonsense
http://gamahucherpress.yellowgum.com/wp ... TS-DON.pdf
Biologists agree there is species hybridization
but that contradicts what a species is
3) biologist tell us they investigate life
http://gamahucherpress.yellowgum.com/wp ... cience.pdf
but
they cant tell us what life is-they can tell us what life does but cant tell us what life is they cant even give a
definition of life that is not nonsense"
https://www.reddit.com/r/PostPoMo/comme ... s_ends_in/
"A ROLLICKING ASSAULT ON SCIENCE'S INABILITY TO ANSWER LIFE'S MOST IMPORTANT QUESTIONS
Alex Tsakiris has interviewed many bestselling authors and dozens of world-class academics on his popular science podcast Skeptiko.com. In this book he shares with us what he's learned through his 200 plus interviews with some of the world’s leading consciousness researchers and thinkers. In doing so, he reveals what the best research is saying about “big picture” science questions and the limits of science in general. What's he's learned, in short, is that science-as-we-know-it is an emperor-with-no-clothes-on proposition. It mesmerizes us with flashy trinkets, while failing at its core mission of leading us toward self-discovery. Science is wrong about almost everything because science depends on our consciousness being an illusion―and it’s not!
"Alex Tsakiris has articulated in this feisty work what many of us in the academy have felt but have not quite had the courage to say. Alex writes as our conscience here, as he calls us all to balk against the silly and self-contradictory script that is reductive materialism. Such a balking, Alex reminds us, does not make us creationists or anti-science, as the skeptics would have us believe. It makes us conscious beings who refuse this bizarre pact of unconsciousness, meaninglessness, and depression." ― Jeffrey J. Kripal, J. Newton Rayzor Professor of Religion, Rice University and author of Authors of the Impossible
"In the best of American traditions, Tsakiris is a plain-talking Everyman who speaks truth to power. Only, in this case, power is a scientific paradigm that has Ivy League academics and New York media intellectuals completely in its thrall. Are materialists right? Not if you follow the data. Tsakiris brings some giants to their knees, here, simply by asking smart, tough questions that no one has thought to ask. Fascinating stuff." ― Patricia Pearson, author of Opening Heaven's Door
"Tsakiris has distilled the essence of his podcast Skeptiko into a book as direct as his show-and equally necessary. If you want evidence that consciousness is not an illusion, that we are more than biological robots, this book is a great place to start." ― Steve Volk, writer-at-large for Philadelphia Magazine and author of Fringe-ology"
https://www.amazon.com/Science-Wrong-Ab ... 1938398319
I'm cringing inside. god help me
Magister colin leslie dean the only modern Renaissance man with 9 degrees including 4 masters: B,Sc, BA, B.Litt(Hons), MA, B.Litt(Hons), MA, MA (Psychoanalytic studies), Master of Psychoanalytic studies, Grad Cert (Literary studies) : who proved Godels theorems to be invalid
He is also Australia's leading erotic poet
http://gamahucherpress.yellowgum.com/book-genre/poetry/
and showed science/mathematics ends in meaninglessness
1)Mathematics/science ends in contradiction:an integer=a non-integer
http://gamahucherpress.yellowgum.com/wp ... ssible.pdf
2)Mathematics ends in contradiction:6 examples example 1 it is proven 1+1=1
http://gamahucherpress.yellowgum.com/wp ... MATICS.pdf
all very simple and clear
the facts are
1) it is proven an integer = a non-integer
1 is a finite number it stops
A finite decimal is one that stops, like 0.157
A non-finite decimal like 0.888... does not stop
A non-finite decimal like 0.999... does not stop
when a finite number 1 = a non-finite number 0.999.. then maths ends in contradiction
another way
1 is an integer a whole number
0.888... is a non-integer it is not a whole number
0.999... is a non-integer not a whole number
when a integer 1 =a non-integer 0.999... maths ends in contradiction
)1)Darwins book is called On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection ....
but
this paper shows natural selection is not the origin of new species Natural selection is not the origin of new species
http://gamahucherpress.yellowgum.com/bo ... ection.pdf
"Natural selection does not generate new genes/species Natural selection adds no new genetic information as it only
deals with the passing on of genes/traits already present and it will be pointed out genetics cannot account for
the generation of new species/genes as it is claimed the generation of new genes [via mutation] is a random
process due to radiation, viruses, chemicals etc and genetic cannot account for these process happening as they
are out side the scope of genetics physics, chaos theory etc may give some explanation but genetics cant"
2) Biologist cant tell us what a species is -without contradiction thus evolution theory ie evolving species is nonsense
http://gamahucherpress.yellowgum.com/wp ... TS-DON.pdf
Biologists agree there is species hybridization
but that contradicts what a species is
3) biologist tell us they investigate life
http://gamahucherpress.yellowgum.com/wp ... cience.pdf
but
they cant tell us what life is-they can tell us what life does but cant tell us what life is they cant even give a
definition of life that is not nonsense"
https://www.reddit.com/r/PostPoMo/comme ... s_ends_in/
"A ROLLICKING ASSAULT ON SCIENCE'S INABILITY TO ANSWER LIFE'S MOST IMPORTANT QUESTIONS
Alex Tsakiris has interviewed many bestselling authors and dozens of world-class academics on his popular science podcast Skeptiko.com. In this book he shares with us what he's learned through his 200 plus interviews with some of the world’s leading consciousness researchers and thinkers. In doing so, he reveals what the best research is saying about “big picture” science questions and the limits of science in general. What's he's learned, in short, is that science-as-we-know-it is an emperor-with-no-clothes-on proposition. It mesmerizes us with flashy trinkets, while failing at its core mission of leading us toward self-discovery. Science is wrong about almost everything because science depends on our consciousness being an illusion―and it’s not!
"Alex Tsakiris has articulated in this feisty work what many of us in the academy have felt but have not quite had the courage to say. Alex writes as our conscience here, as he calls us all to balk against the silly and self-contradictory script that is reductive materialism. Such a balking, Alex reminds us, does not make us creationists or anti-science, as the skeptics would have us believe. It makes us conscious beings who refuse this bizarre pact of unconsciousness, meaninglessness, and depression." ― Jeffrey J. Kripal, J. Newton Rayzor Professor of Religion, Rice University and author of Authors of the Impossible
"In the best of American traditions, Tsakiris is a plain-talking Everyman who speaks truth to power. Only, in this case, power is a scientific paradigm that has Ivy League academics and New York media intellectuals completely in its thrall. Are materialists right? Not if you follow the data. Tsakiris brings some giants to their knees, here, simply by asking smart, tough questions that no one has thought to ask. Fascinating stuff." ― Patricia Pearson, author of Opening Heaven's Door
"Tsakiris has distilled the essence of his podcast Skeptiko into a book as direct as his show-and equally necessary. If you want evidence that consciousness is not an illusion, that we are more than biological robots, this book is a great place to start." ― Steve Volk, writer-at-large for Philadelphia Magazine and author of Fringe-ology"
https://www.amazon.com/Science-Wrong-Ab ... 1938398319
I'm cringing inside. god help me