Posted: Mar 09, 2010 3:26 pm
rainbow wrote:OgreMkV wrote:rainbow, go read the paper. If you have a problem with it, I'll be glad to discuss it with you.
I would read it, but I have no access to it. I have explained this to you.
Are you going to share the full paper with us?
I wasn't planning on it. It's via a paid subscription to Nature and I'm not sure of the copy right laws.
Do you have any objection to the abstract as shown in the link? If not, then just move on. We'll call you 'objecting until you've read the paper'. However, I've got to say, if you object to papers that you haven't read...
Well it's kind of like Behe in the Dover trial. He was presented with a couple dozen books and over 50 articles that he hadn't read, yet he knew that they didn't sufficiently explain why he was wrong.
Please continue. Mayeb your next post will pull up some free papers...