Posted: May 03, 2012 9:27 pm
Byron wrote:
And this is where your case slams into the buffers.
If you think that, then I think it's fairly safe for me to conclude that this is what you think. Pardon me for not noticing the jolt.
Byron wrote: Oh, and which Hoffman cite of mine are you referring to? Point it out and (due to my total lack of interest) I'll withdraw it.
Did I refer to a Hoffmann cite of yours?
I think I might have noted that you said Carrier was inconsistent, didn't back it up, and seemed to ignore commenting on Hoffman when he was inconsistent (in a different way). So, lucky you, you don't have to withdraw anything.