Posted: May 03, 2012 11:15 pm
archibald wrote:Did I refer to a Hoffmann cite of yours?
archibald wrote:Byron wrote:Just like Hoffmann. I couldn't give a rat's ass what he did or didn't believe. This isn't authority top trumps.
?
You're citing Hoffmann, and yet.....so far you haven't made any comment on what he said in response to Carrier, even though the former has been demonstrably inconsistent and the latter...well, we still await your citation.
More to the point, you haven't commented on what Hoffman apparently said in 2009.
You see Byron, that's my problem with you. You can't admit it's reasonable to doubt because, well, I don't know what your reasons are. For you the alternative has to be, essentially, untenable. Anyone with half a brain can see that that isn't the case. People like Willhud and Ignorantia and MS2 and many others who end us favouring HJ nonetheless. To me, you're in the same category as 'myther scum' stein, who appears so attached to the idea that it upsets him if anyone takes a contra view.
So either yes, or work on your posts' clarity. As you like.
Perhaps you can detail where & how my approach differs from those other folks you list. So we know that this is something more than divide and irritate.