Posted: May 04, 2012 7:16 am
by archibald
Byron wrote:
So either yes, or work on your posts' clarity. As you like.


I meant 'cite' as in 'mention' not as in 'quote', Byers. Now that that's cleared up, I wonder if I can expect any comment of substance on the matter. Can you explain how a man could go from saying that the question of historicity is unanswerable in 2009 to saying that mythicists are nutters in 2012.

Byron wrote:Perhaps you can detail where & how my approach differs from those other folks you list. So we know that this is something more than divide and irritate.


No, you're right. I can't detail it. It wasn't just an honest comment on your apparent need to trash your non-preferred view. I was employing a divide and irritate strategy, as you correctly infer. You caught me red handed there. Sheesh, I slammed into the buffers on that non-starter.