Posted: May 08, 2012 7:10 am
People here may enjoy the discussion between Carrier and a commenter on this blog post. Starting at comment 63, the commenter asks some very good questions about the status of evidence in Carrier's fantasist theory while Carrier becomes increasingly evasive and starts to fire his ad hom cannon ("Trying to pull fallacies on me like moving the goal posts, non sequitur, argument by assertion, and other nonsense, is wasting my time and yours." "Trying to claim that isn’t how our conversation proceeded is starting to make you look like a liar at this point. At the very least, you clearly can’t engage in an intelligible conversation.") at the end. It is not a good impression of Carrier.