Posted: May 08, 2012 7:30 am
angelo wrote:Seems to me like its a case of attacking the messenger.
Eh, if you mean with that that I'm attacking Carrier, then you might want to look again. What I have done is pointing people to a discussion where Carrier performs pretty poorly and is incapable of presenting evidence. Then I note Carrier's fallacious tactics to dismiss his opponent and comment that he makes a poor impression. So where am I exactly "attacking"?
Now if you mean that the commenter is attacking Carrier, that's an even weirder claim since the commenter used overall even more careful language than I did in my post (which was also not rude or a personal attack). So what are you complaining about?
Aside that, have you read the exchange? What are your thoughts on it?