Posted: May 08, 2012 8:59 pm
archibald wrote:Ian Tattum wrote:
.... I think I see what he is getting at, but he does seem to be one of those scholars whose interest in the past transcends the old stables of what happened, why and to whom. To place the origin of religions into its own category seems to me to go too far. For example ponder the differing challenges of reconstructing the histories of Moses, Zoroaster,Plotinus, St Francis of Assissi and Ron L Hubbard.
In relation to Ellegard maybe. I take it you were referring to him.
As for Torstendahl, he sounds to me like he's got the right approach.
I read too fast, and didnt notice the interpolation
