Posted: May 08, 2012 10:37 pm
by archibald
Byron wrote:
archibald wrote:
Byron wrote:

I continue to give less than a gnat's fart about Hoffman's supposed u-turn, as it has exactly fuck all to do with the merits of the HJ case.

Yes. I'd half forgotten your modus operandi. Best to have a personal mini-hegemony, I suppose, just in case the one in the outside world disappoints.

Was there an answer to my points against MJ lurking there?

If so, please, illuminate. :cheers:



Why? So you can declare it a 'non starter' or yourself as 'not playing' or 'bored' or 'not giving a gnat's fart'........yet again. :)

One can only handle so much of that carry on.

If you ever make a point of substance about HJ that doesn't have the word 'tenure' in it, let me know. Email me. I'll integrate it into my ology.

Byron wrote: How many points of similarity must there be between the gospels and the historical reality in order to say that Jesus existed?


What 'historical reality' do you have in mind, one wonders? Your route deserves a new descriptor. I suggest 'mobius strip thinking'.